×
First-time login tip: If you're a REBA Member, you'll need to reset your password the first time you login.
21 Feb 2018
by Sarah Lardner

How good job evaluations reduce the risk of equal pay claims

We all know how valuable job evaluation is. It provides a consistent methodology of assessing and valuing roles, identifying where they sit within the organisational hierarchy, and it’s also useful for creating grading and to overlay pay. As such, job evaluation is one of the most important tool in the HR arsenal.

8D60-1519131274_JobevaluationMAIN.jpg

However, all too often job evaluation is just used as a one-time tool to aid the creation of reward programmes, and then left to wither away in a file somewhere – and in my view this is a mistake. Once HR teams have made the effort to create this invaluable source of insight into their job DNA, they should put it to work every day.

Not taking job evaluation seriously can have unfortunate consequences. A prime example is the Tesco equal pay group claim, which I discussed on BBC radio recently.

It has come as a shock to Tesco that thousands of female employees are presenting a group equal pay claim, based on the view that as female shop floor staff, they are paid less than male warehouse staff despite performing work of equal value. Employees at Sainsbury’s and Asda are bringing similar group claims, with a huge potential cost to their employers in backpay and negative publicity.

The value of a good job evaluation framework

It's possible that Tesco, Sainsbury's and Asda could have saved themselves a lot of pain by using a more robust job evaluation system which identifies work of equal value. This is where the work is similar, and roles are equal in terms of demands, effort, skills and decision making. A good job evaluation framework avoids bias due to historical division of labour based on gender roles, since it will assess roles in a fair and consistent manner, and judge each role using the same gender-neutral criteria.

It’s important to check that your job evaluation system is up to the job. In the past, I’ve seen systems which assess roles based on loaded terminology such as ‘physical’, ‘emotional’, ‘caring’, or ‘strong’. A decent system will enable you to create a fair, transparent structure for your organisation. It shows true commitment to employees that you are serious about paying fairly, providing consistency and being transparent around reward.

Of course, it would be naive to suggest that job evaluation is the only aspect that will need to be addressed internally, as often policies and practices also have inherent bias. This is why we prefer to support clients with a ‘deep dive’ equal pay audit and review to identify any weak elements.

The issue of equal pay for equal work is not going away any time soon and employers need to build their credibility around gender equality; especially given the related requirements over gender pay. Don’t get caught out by neglecting your job evaluation and risk facing equal pay claims as a result.

Sarah Lardner is client director at Innecto Reward Consulting. 

This article was supplied by Innecto Reward Consulting. 

In partnership with Innecto Reward Consulting

We have more than 20 years' experience in getting employers' pay and reward working harder for them.

Contact us today